Introduction
Many motorists believe that allowing another person to accept penalty points for a driving offence is a minor matter. In reality, taking penalty points for someone else can amount to the serious criminal offence of perverting the course of justice.
This offence is treated extremely seriously by the courts because it involves deliberately misleading the authorities and interfering with the administration of justice.
Even when the underlying offence is relatively minor, such as speeding, providing false information about the driver can lead to criminal prosecution and a prison sentence.
Understanding how the law applies to these situations is crucial if you are under investigation or facing allegations.
What Is Perverting the Course of Justice?
Perverting the course of justice is a common law criminal offence in England and Wales.
The offence occurs when a person
- Does an act or engages in a course of conduct
- That has a tendency to interfere with the administration of justice
- And intends to do so.
The offence is extremely broad and covers a wide range of conduct, including:
- Destroying or concealing evidence
- Making false allegations
- Interfering with witnesses
- Providing false information during a criminal investigation
- Assisting someone to evade arrest
Because the offence strikes at the integrity of the justice system, the courts treat it with particular seriousness. The maximum sentence is life imprisonment, although such sentences are rare and reserved for the most serious cases.
Why Taking Penalty Points for Someone Else Is Illegal
When a speeding or traffic offence is detected by a camera, the registered keeper of the vehicle will usually receive a Notice of Intended Prosecution requiring them to identify the driver.
Providing false information in response to this notice is where criminal liability arises.
Common examples include:
- A friend claiming to have been the driver when they were not
- A family member accepting penalty points to protect another driver
- Providing false driver details to avoid a driving ban
These actions are considered deliberate attempts to mislead the authorities, which can amount to perverting the course of justice.
Even if the underlying offence is minor, the act of deception itself is treated as a serious criminal matter.

Common Examples of Perverting the Course of Justice in Driving Cases
Many prosecutions arise from attempts to avoid the consequences of driving offences.
Typical scenarios include:
False Driver Nominations
A person falsely claims they were driving a vehicle when a speeding offence occurred.
Accepting Penalty Points for Another Driver
Someone accepts licence penalty points on behalf of another motorist to help them avoid disqualification.
Providing False Statements
Giving misleading information to the police during a motoring investigation.
Concealing Evidence
Destroying evidence or deliberately obstructing a police investigation.
In high-profile cases, individuals have been prosecuted and imprisoned for falsely accepting penalty points for another person.
What Is the Sentence for Perverting the Course of Justice?
Perverting the course of justice carries extremely serious penalties.
The offence is triable only in the Crown Court, reflecting its seriousness.
Sentencing Guidelines
The courts consider several factors when deciding sentence, including:
- The seriousness of the underlying offence
- The level of planning involved
- Whether an innocent person was implicated
- The impact on the investigation
Recent guidance indicates that sentences may range from community orders to several years’ imprisonment, depending on the circumstances
Typical Sentences in Motoring Cases
Even where the underlying offence is a speeding offence, courts frequently impose custodial sentences.
In many cases involving false driver nominations:
- Sentences of several months’ imprisonment are common
- Suspended sentences may be imposed in less serious cases
- Community orders may be considered in limited circumstances
The courts emphasise the importance of deterring motorists from attempting to avoid penalty points through deception.
How Police Investigate Penalty Point Fraud
Investigations often begin when inconsistencies appear in driver nomination forms.
Modern investigations may involve:
- ANPR and CCTV evidence
- Mobile phone location data
- Social media activity
- Witness statements
- Forensic document analysis
Authorities may also compare travel records, vehicle use patterns and digital evidence to determine who was actually driving at the time of the offence.
Because technology and investigative techniques have advanced significantly, attempts to conceal the true driver are increasingly likely to be detected.
Facing Legal Issue?
Regain peace of mind and balance in your life by contacting us now for a consultation with our Motoring Offences specialist
Strictly Confidential and No Obligation

Possible Defences to Allegations
Every case depends on its specific facts.
Potential defence arguments may include:
Lack of Intent
The prosecution must prove that the accused intended to interfere with the course of justice.
Mistaken Identity
The accused may genuinely have believed that another person was driving.
Insufficient Evidence
The prosecution must prove the offence beyond reasonable doubt.
Procedural Issues
Errors in the investigation or prosecution process may affect the case.
A detailed review of the evidence is essential to identify the most appropriate defence strategy.
How a Criminal Defence Solicitor Can Help
Allegations of perverting the course of justice are extremely serious and require specialist legal representation.
An experienced criminal defence solicitor can:
- Analyse the evidence against you
- Identify weaknesses in the prosecution case
- Advise on plea strategy
- Represent you in the Crown Court
- Present mitigation to reduce the risk of custody where appropriate
Early legal advice is particularly important if you are under investigation or have been contacted by the police.
5 Key Takeaways
- Accepting penalty points for another driver may amount to perverting the course of justice.
- The offence involves deliberately misleading the police or court process.
- Cases often arise from false driver nominations for speeding offences.
- The offence is indictable only and dealt with in the Crown Court.
- Sentences frequently involve immediate custody, even for motoring cases.
Frequently Asked Questions
Yes. Accepting penalty points on behalf of another driver can amount to perverting the course of justice, which frequently results in custodial sentences.
Yes. Providing false information about the identity of a driver may constitute perverting the course of justice or a related criminal offence.
If the authorities discover that false driver information was provided, those involved may face prosecution in the Crown Court.
The maximum penalty is life imprisonment, although sentences of this severity are extremely rare.
Not always. Sentences depend on the circumstances of the case, the level of planning involved and the impact on the investigation.
Yes. Courts often impose much harsher penalties for perverting the course of justice than for the underlying motoring offence.
Call us on 0333 009 6275. We are available to take your call 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
You can also email us on enquiries@ashmanssolicitors.com or complete our Online Enquiry Form and we’ll be in touch soon.
Start your defence journey.
How can we help?
Please complete the form below with as much detail as possible.
Related insights and updates
